GraphQL vs gRPC: Choosing Modern API Technologies
Choosing between GraphQL and gRPC? Learn how they differ in speed, developer experience, and scalability. Perfect guide for system design prep.
This article compares GraphQL and gRPC in terms of performance and flexibility, and helps you decide when to use each technology for your projects.
Imagine you’re building a new app and need to design the communication between services or between your backend and frontend.
You’ve heard about GraphQL’s flexibility and gRPC’s speed, but which one is right for you?
Both GraphQL and gRPC emerged in the mid-2010s as modern alternatives to traditional REST APIs, each addressing some of REST’s shortcomings.
In this guide, we’ll break down what GraphQL and gRPC are, compare their performance and flexibility, and explore when to choose each.
By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which technology fits your needs and why.
Let’s get in!
What is GraphQL?
GraphQL is an open-source query language for APIs, released in 2015.
Unlike REST (which might require multiple endpoints or round trips to gather data), GraphQL lets clients ask for exactly the data they need from a single endpoint.
You define a schema on the server that describes the data types and relationships, and clients send queries specifying which fields they want.
The server then returns JSON data matching the query.
This approach means no more over-fetching (getting too much data) or under-fetching (not getting everything you need) – the client controls the response shape.
For example, a mobile app can fetch a user’s profile and their recent posts in one go, even if that data comes from different sources.
GraphQL also supports mutations (for updates) and subscriptions (for real-time updates), making it versatile for a variety of application needs.
And because the schema is strongly typed, front-end developers get a self-documenting API they can explore via introspection and developer tools.
In short, GraphQL is all about flexibility for the client.
What is gRPC?
gRPC is a high-performance Remote Procedure Call (RPC) framework open-sourced in 2015.
It’s built on HTTP/2 and uses Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) for its interface definition and data serialization.
In simple terms, with gRPC you define services and methods in a .proto file (including the data types for request and response), and gRPC generates code for you in multiple languages.
A client can then call a method on the server as if it’s a local function – gRPC handles the networking under the hood.
Because it uses a binary format and HTTP/2, gRPC is extremely efficient and supports features like multiplexing and streaming.
It’s ideal for scenarios where speed and low latency are critical, such as microservice architectures or real-time systems.
gRPC natively supports streaming: a client or server can send a stream of messages as a single call (unary, server-streaming, client-streaming, or bidirectional streaming).
This makes gRPC great for things like video calls, live feeds, or connecting internal services.
The trade-off is that gRPC is more rigid – you must define the contract upfront – and it’s not human-readable on the wire (being binary, it’s harder to debug without tools).
Also, calling gRPC from web browsers isn’t straightforward without a proxy or special gRPC-Web support.
In essence, gRPC is about performance and a strong contract between services.
Performance and Efficiency
When it comes to raw performance, gRPC has the edge. Its use of HTTP/2 and binary Protobuf messages means data travels fast and light.
The messages are compact and require less processing to decode, resulting in efficient, low-latency communication – perfect for high-throughput scenarios.
In contrast, GraphQL typically sends data as text (JSON) along with field names, which increases payload size and parsing time. This additional overhead can impact performance if you need to exchange data rapidly or at scale.
However, performance isn’t just about bytes on the wire – it’s also about network round trips.
This is where GraphQL can shine.
GraphQL allows the client to get all required data in a single request (by nesting queries for related data), avoiding multiple request/response cycles.
On slow or unreliable connections, this single-query advantage leads to significant performance gains.
So, which is faster?
Generally, gRPC wins in raw throughput and low latency (especially server-to-server), while GraphQL can improve perceived performance in client-server scenarios by cutting down extra calls.
Flexibility and Data Modeling
This is where GraphQL truly shines. It was designed to give clients the power to ask for exactly what they need and nothing more.
The client defines the structure of the response, which means no more getting a giant blob of data when you only wanted a few fields.
If your application has diverse or evolving data needs – for instance, different screens or client apps each requiring different fields – GraphQL provides unparalleled flexibility.
You can add new fields to the schema without breaking older clients. Its introspection feature also lets developers explore the schema itself.
gRPC, on the other hand, favors a more rigid, predefined structure.
Clients call specific methods and get the data those methods return, nothing more or less.
While less flexible, this strict contract yields consistency and clarity.
Protobuf ensures type mismatches are caught at compile time, which is especially valuable in large systems.
In short, GraphQL offers flexibility and adaptability, whereas gRPC offers stability and well-defined contracts.
Developer Experience and Tooling
GraphQL and gRPC take different approaches to developer experience.
With GraphQL, clients can immediately start querying once the server is up. Its introspection and tooling make APIs discoverable and easy to test.
Frontend developers often love GraphQL because it aligns closely with how UI data requirements evolve.
gRPC involves defining proto files and generating code stubs for clients and servers. This extra step provides strong type safety and easy interoperability across languages.
But inspecting or testing a gRPC service requires additional tools, and API changes require regenerating client stubs.
In summary, GraphQL favors an explorative and flexible workflow, while gRPC favors a structured and robust workflow.
Use Cases: When to Use GraphQL vs gRPC
Choose GraphQL if… you’re building client-facing APIs where flexibility is key. It’s ideal when web and mobile apps need different data views, or when you want to aggregate data from multiple sources behind one endpoint.
Choose gRPC if… you need blazing-fast communication between services. It’s a natural fit for microservice architectures, real-time systems, or polyglot environments where multiple programming languages need to interoperate.
In many systems, the answer is not either/or but both: GraphQL at the client boundary for flexibility, and gRPC between internal services for speed.
Check out Grokking the System Design and Grokking the Advanced System Design courses by DesignnGurus.io.
FAQs
Q1: What is the difference between GraphQL and gRPC?
GraphQL is a query language that lets clients request exactly the data they need, usually over HTTP and JSON. gRPC is a remote procedure call framework using binary Protobuf over HTTP/2 for efficient communication. GraphQL emphasizes flexibility, while gRPC emphasizes performance and strict contracts.
Q2: Which is faster, GraphQL or gRPC?
gRPC is generally faster because of its compact binary messages and HTTP/2. GraphQL may feel faster in client apps by reducing multiple API calls to a single request, but for raw performance, gRPC is superior.
Q3: When should I use GraphQL vs gRPC?
Use GraphQL when you need flexibility and client-driven queries. Use gRPC when performance, streaming, or server-to-server communication are top priorities. Many teams combine both: GraphQL for clients, gRPC for internal services.